Prodi vs. Berlusconi
At the dawn of an undoubtedly new era in Italian politics, I feel I need to comment on this prevalent unwarranted optimism regarding "Prodiana", the premiership of Romano Prodi 2006-?. Will this new era bring about political honesty and integrity? Will Italy be born again?
Here's my two cents' worth: Though I shudder at the thought of Berlusconi running things other than his own shoddy life, I doubt Prodi is a saving angel either. Here's why...
First of all, less corruption is still not as good as no corruption at all.
Benign, likeable face (Prodi) to a massive entourage of intrigue and
conspiracy is hardly an improvement on a glib, shit-faced Berlusconi. First
of all, BOTH Berlusconi and Prodi have questionable links to the "strategia
della tensione" of the 70's-80's. It's hard to uncover the exact nature of
these links, due to piles of lies, but one can try.
One is the linkage of the Communists and the moderate middle-class "Centrists": The Socialist-Christian collusion in the European Catholic countries (plus at least Germany) has led to an incredible history of dishonest political maneuverings, with various atheist-spiritual alliances bordering on the incomprehensible and inconceivable.
For example, in Italy, the Red Brigades and various anarchist
collectives, thoroughly infiltrated by Nato- and CIA-backed neo-fascist
"false flag" operators (Operation Gladio), were almost certainly directed
via black funds in Vatican and/or State-owned banks. So, Prodi's connections
to the "Compromesso Storico" of the 70's and the various groupings in favour
and opposed to it has to lead one to ask: Is this university professor not a
"professor" of political backstabbing and, indeed, assassinations - of which
at least these two come to mind: Aldo Moro of 1978 and a sicilian journalist in 1979 (at the behest of Giulio Andreotti, Prodi's mentor).
Now, Prodi's coalition party of 2006, "l'Unione", is a case study of
"compromise over principle" (although I guess I should be happy that Prodi
cannot yet fulfil his deeper desires for a "spiritual rebirth" of Italy and
Europe!). Is it a continuation of the Historial Compromise, or perhaps an effort to provide an allegedly viable alternative to the corruption of Berlusconi, only to ultimately provide "more of the same"?
In 2006, with radical-leftist groups in cohorts with "Christian humanism", I must point back to the Aldo Moro assassination of 1978, when Prodi, among other important politicians, undertook a "seance" (probably a cover-story) which revealed to the police the cryptic message "Gradoli". This was sadly unheeded, and its relevance to _Via_ Gradoli were not uncovered. Well, ouija
board or not (NOT!!!), Prodi's information at this point seems to have come from "reliable sources", dead or alive (ALIVE!!!), and his position is put into question. Was he acting out of sympathy for Aldo Moro? The hardliners in the parliament sentenced Moro to death, with apparent political motivations. Was Prodi opposed to this, or was he a decoy or a tool of the various anti-communist factions of the Catholic movement? This is not clear. What is clear, however, is that Prodi's "tips" proved correct. But the heads of police and the army, not to mention powerful politicians, being members of Propaganda Due, Aldo Moro was assassinated, in what seemed conspicuously like a state-sponsored (and ultimately CIA-sponsored) assassination.
Berlusconi, that evil bastard, has made a case out of Prodi's involvement with "occult" here, but that's a diversion, no doubt! Berlusconi himself, with clear corporate-fascist and mafia connections, as a member of the P2 during the 1978 assassination (according to Lucio Gelli's own documents discovered in his Tuscany villa!), has a lot to answer for. We know that P2 is a collusion of Catholic, Masonic, Industrialist and Neo-Fascist powers. We know of its role in the Banco Ambrosiano scandal, and its probably role in various drug-smuggling and other mafia-related organized crime networks. Thus Berlusconi was certainly "placed" in power via criminal money, as a kind of Il Duce 2. Wasn't it Mussolini who said that "fascism should properly be called the merger of state and corporate power"?
Why hasn't Berlusconi come clean of his past? Why hasn't Prodi outed him?
It's very clear. They both are working for the same interests, whether it's
the Holy Inquisition of Cardinal/Pope Ratzinger, the power politics of mafia
and big business, freemasonic "Great Work" or some atheist-socialist-humanist-fascist utopia.
I hold these things against Prodi: a history of Vatican nepotism
("raccomandazione") in the intellectual and public fields (a form of
intellectual obedience/slavery towards the Papacy), an almost certain
collusion with various competing (to the Church) secret societies,
including, but not limited to, Propaganda Due, various occult circles, the
bolognaise mafia, Cosa Nostra, radical-left terror groups,
international Christian missionary organisations, the Bilderberg group (e.g.
1999), European Union, ECB, NATO etc etc...
Now, all of these things hold true, even stronger, for Berlusconi, so I
guess there is room for jubiliation. Or is there?
With Prodi in an integral position in the advancement of the European Union,
we can expect him (see his book "Un'idea dell'Europa") to further an agenda of Catholic universalism, whether disguised as humanism or ethnic integration. His is a vision of the late Middle Ages, rather than even the Renaissance!
In the U.S. Bush and Kerry were and are members of a Yale secret society, and recipients of corporate finance; so in Italy Prodi and Berlusconi are recipients of corporate and trade union finance, as well as players in a grand chess battle of interlocking secret societies.
Like most Western democracies (bah, "democracies"), Italy is a mess. An
entertaining mess, but mess nonetheless.
Welcome to the real-life Umberto Eco novel (or, for that matter, Dario Fo play) we call Italian politics!
Here's my two cents' worth: Though I shudder at the thought of Berlusconi running things other than his own shoddy life, I doubt Prodi is a saving angel either. Here's why...
First of all, less corruption is still not as good as no corruption at all.
Benign, likeable face (Prodi) to a massive entourage of intrigue and
conspiracy is hardly an improvement on a glib, shit-faced Berlusconi. First
of all, BOTH Berlusconi and Prodi have questionable links to the "strategia
della tensione" of the 70's-80's. It's hard to uncover the exact nature of
these links, due to piles of lies, but one can try.
One is the linkage of the Communists and the moderate middle-class "Centrists": The Socialist-Christian collusion in the European Catholic countries (plus at least Germany) has led to an incredible history of dishonest political maneuverings, with various atheist-spiritual alliances bordering on the incomprehensible and inconceivable.
For example, in Italy, the Red Brigades and various anarchist
collectives, thoroughly infiltrated by Nato- and CIA-backed neo-fascist
"false flag" operators (Operation Gladio), were almost certainly directed
via black funds in Vatican and/or State-owned banks. So, Prodi's connections
to the "Compromesso Storico" of the 70's and the various groupings in favour
and opposed to it has to lead one to ask: Is this university professor not a
"professor" of political backstabbing and, indeed, assassinations - of which
at least these two come to mind: Aldo Moro of 1978 and a sicilian journalist in 1979 (at the behest of Giulio Andreotti, Prodi's mentor).
Now, Prodi's coalition party of 2006, "l'Unione", is a case study of
"compromise over principle" (although I guess I should be happy that Prodi
cannot yet fulfil his deeper desires for a "spiritual rebirth" of Italy and
Europe!). Is it a continuation of the Historial Compromise, or perhaps an effort to provide an allegedly viable alternative to the corruption of Berlusconi, only to ultimately provide "more of the same"?
In 2006, with radical-leftist groups in cohorts with "Christian humanism", I must point back to the Aldo Moro assassination of 1978, when Prodi, among other important politicians, undertook a "seance" (probably a cover-story) which revealed to the police the cryptic message "Gradoli". This was sadly unheeded, and its relevance to _Via_ Gradoli were not uncovered. Well, ouija
board or not (NOT!!!), Prodi's information at this point seems to have come from "reliable sources", dead or alive (ALIVE!!!), and his position is put into question. Was he acting out of sympathy for Aldo Moro? The hardliners in the parliament sentenced Moro to death, with apparent political motivations. Was Prodi opposed to this, or was he a decoy or a tool of the various anti-communist factions of the Catholic movement? This is not clear. What is clear, however, is that Prodi's "tips" proved correct. But the heads of police and the army, not to mention powerful politicians, being members of Propaganda Due, Aldo Moro was assassinated, in what seemed conspicuously like a state-sponsored (and ultimately CIA-sponsored) assassination.
Berlusconi, that evil bastard, has made a case out of Prodi's involvement with "occult" here, but that's a diversion, no doubt! Berlusconi himself, with clear corporate-fascist and mafia connections, as a member of the P2 during the 1978 assassination (according to Lucio Gelli's own documents discovered in his Tuscany villa!), has a lot to answer for. We know that P2 is a collusion of Catholic, Masonic, Industrialist and Neo-Fascist powers. We know of its role in the Banco Ambrosiano scandal, and its probably role in various drug-smuggling and other mafia-related organized crime networks. Thus Berlusconi was certainly "placed" in power via criminal money, as a kind of Il Duce 2. Wasn't it Mussolini who said that "fascism should properly be called the merger of state and corporate power"?
Why hasn't Berlusconi come clean of his past? Why hasn't Prodi outed him?
It's very clear. They both are working for the same interests, whether it's
the Holy Inquisition of Cardinal/Pope Ratzinger, the power politics of mafia
and big business, freemasonic "Great Work" or some atheist-socialist-humanist-fascist utopia.
I hold these things against Prodi: a history of Vatican nepotism
("raccomandazione") in the intellectual and public fields (a form of
intellectual obedience/slavery towards the Papacy), an almost certain
collusion with various competing (to the Church) secret societies,
including, but not limited to, Propaganda Due, various occult circles, the
bolognaise mafia, Cosa Nostra, radical-left terror groups,
international Christian missionary organisations, the Bilderberg group (e.g.
1999), European Union, ECB, NATO etc etc...
Now, all of these things hold true, even stronger, for Berlusconi, so I
guess there is room for jubiliation. Or is there?
With Prodi in an integral position in the advancement of the European Union,
we can expect him (see his book "Un'idea dell'Europa") to further an agenda of Catholic universalism, whether disguised as humanism or ethnic integration. His is a vision of the late Middle Ages, rather than even the Renaissance!
In the U.S. Bush and Kerry were and are members of a Yale secret society, and recipients of corporate finance; so in Italy Prodi and Berlusconi are recipients of corporate and trade union finance, as well as players in a grand chess battle of interlocking secret societies.
Like most Western democracies (bah, "democracies"), Italy is a mess. An
entertaining mess, but mess nonetheless.
Welcome to the real-life Umberto Eco novel (or, for that matter, Dario Fo play) we call Italian politics!
posted by BoxBob | 3:15 AM
|
0 comments
